From: Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Proliferation of Reserved Words
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:23:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0001HW.26684A72012ECEAA700009A5738F@news.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 827c60f6-b008-468b-9ab4-cf110edff252n@googlegroups.com
On 2 Jun 2021, AdaMagica wrote
(in article<827c60f6-b008-468b-9ab4-cf110edff252n@googlegroups.com>):
> Thinking about this:
> Ultimatey, we could perhaps do with just one reserved word called keyword.
> Depending on the place where is stands makes it clear what it means:
> keyword I keyword 1..10 keyword
> X(I) := I + 1;
> Keyword;
Should that not finish off thus:
keyword keyword;
? 8-)
--
Bill Findlay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 20:51 Proliferation of Reserved Words Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-05-31 21:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-06-01 5:54 ` Randy Brukardt
2021-06-01 7:40 ` Paul Rubin
2021-06-03 8:48 ` Robin Vowels
2021-06-01 9:51 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-06-01 16:06 ` Simon Wright
2021-06-01 11:48 ` Luke A. Guest
2021-06-02 18:13 ` AdaMagica
2021-06-02 19:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2021-06-02 20:13 ` Chris Townley
2021-06-02 20:18 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2021-06-02 23:23 ` Bill Findlay [this message]
2021-06-03 23:58 ` Keith Thompson
2021-06-04 6:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox