From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "Usability" (was Re: Map iteration and modification) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:19:52 +0000 Organization: none Message-ID: <0001HW.2B4D9B980012565430AA0D38F@news.individual.net> References: Reply-To: findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net HGm8pwxwc/UH83KyLQYxyQhrv7O5gB65Kv/ks3SO99J0ah4Xsf X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:tTU6V5P3YBfBgfvZPsEPkFIv4JU= sha256:uzxgwK+JNFXLlT2sXwq79ppakOtsm7vHL/L6snKCWsU= User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65975 List-Id: On 7 Jan 2024, J-P. Rosen wrote (in article ): > Le 06/01/2024 à 03:03, Randy Brukardt a écrit: > > Usability is of course not just ease-of-writing, but a lot of people tend to > > co-mingle the two. For readability, too little information can be just as > > bad as too much. For writability, the less you have to write, the better. > Yes, I'm always surprised to see many languages (including Rust) > praising themselves of being "concise". Apart from saving some > keystrokes, I fail to see the benefit of being concise... Agreed. However, it is a bit of a totem in the FP cult. -- Bill Findlay