From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Interfacing with C ; an ununsed fields dilemma
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-07-02T04:48:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0165e574-6ebf-42d4-b524-5de14227a442@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: de77ea5e-47ea-4a94-a736-a8e214d8924c@x17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com
On 2 juil, 12:16, Martin <martin.do...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> pragma Zero_Fill sounds interesting...but it isn't standard :-(
>
> Cheers
> -- Martin
Not standard, and not understood by at least the GNAT compiler
What a pitty, this would have been exactly what I was looking for
A quick search on the web shows that this has been a proposal by
someone in 2004
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-02 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 6:20 Interfacing with C ; an ununsed fields dilemma Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-02 9:25 ` Martin
2009-07-02 18:14 ` reserved fields; was " tmoran
2009-07-02 9:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-07-02 12:01 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-02 12:09 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-07-02 13:21 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-02 15:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-07-02 14:52 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-07-02 23:21 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-03 7:21 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-07-02 9:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-07-02 10:16 ` Martin
2009-07-02 11:48 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
2009-07-02 15:55 ` Robert A Duff
2009-07-04 0:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-07-03 6:59 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox