From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 X-Received: by 2002:a37:6d47:: with SMTP id i68mr32274423qkc.74.1596015848751; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:44:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e641:: with SMTP id x1mr30979884qkl.424.1596015848614; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:44:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7eb81f02-b843-4da9-89d2-951cf56e8362o@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2607:f2c0:9301:ea00:7c1a:c519:659c:f44d; posting-account=XGBE5QoAAABsRez5Xjd0KD5FXhbiCPL- NNTP-Posting-Host: 2607:f2c0:9301:ea00:7c1a:c519:659c:f44d References: <52baf1e5-f0a5-42be-acc7-75fb17fb6f4co@googlegroups.com> <5f1e8b54$0$5873$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <1f630159-0f94-4bb8-9917-408757b4eaedo@googlegroups.com> <7eb81f02-b843-4da9-89d2-951cf56e8362o@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <03f3400f-a6d2-4c02-bf96-962912b2c4ffo@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: AdaCore's survey regarding the future of GNAT Community Edition From: foo wong Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:44:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59582 List-Id: Hi Everyone My name is Patrick, not Foo, I am just trying to keep Google off my trail. = I have been posting here for 8+ years. I just wanted to say that I am very happy to read this thread. I have wrote several disparaging posts about Adacore and my take on the sit= uation was: - GNAT Pro: professional support, more targets. - GNAT Community: Lower level of quality assurance, less targets, and a pu= re GPL license for the run-time for a demoware experience - GNAT FSF: least quality assurance designed to push users to the communit= y build or Pro ASAP I hope I was wrong all along and either way, the future just got a little b= righter as Adacore's two offerings will now be suitable for free or non-fre= e software. I don't believe that there is anything illegal about re-distributing GNAT P= ro so if the gap in quality was so large between Pro and FSF, I think one p= aying customer might take pity on us eventually and release Pro to the worl= d and reset the gap for a while. With dark days setting in for the avionics industry(for a while at least), = maybe Adacore will eventually reconsider and will release Pro as their FSF = offering to broaden their user base. -Patrick