From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f241:: with SMTP id z1mr28001992qvl.53.1572973861729;
        Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e94:: with SMTP id c20mr1878oiy.157.1572973861335;
 Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!j16no2837341qtl.0!news-out.google.com!g53ni772qtg.0!nntp.google.com!j16no2837333qtl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:11:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <32accab7-f2cf-4eba-b4b6-642dd4ea81b3@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.5.2.231;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.5.2.231
References: <32accab7-f2cf-4eba-b4b6-642dd4ea81b3@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <04dd75bd-7c90-467f-b729-ca79e1377d0a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: how would gnoga.com beat www.tck.tk and postgresql on freebsd?
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:11:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2029
X-Received-Body-CRC: 356005817
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57488
Date: 2019-11-05T09:11:01-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 9:46:02 AM UTC-7, Azathoth Hastur wrote:
> would it be easier?
Possibly, because there's [optionally] non-database options... depending on your needs.
The bindings to databases are exactly the same order of complexity in this regard.

> faster?
The Ada.Containers can be used to keep things in memory, and if you're working on small datasets then you likely don't need a database at all. If you can do this, it is faster. / This was the method I used in my bulletin-board site. 

> fewer errors?
Yes: Gnoga's DB bindings + migration protocol is *VERY* good for reducing errors. It would be even fewer if I can get NMESON (pure-Ada graph-based database) modernized and integrated into Gnoga.