From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:aed:2542:: with SMTP id w2mr2017245qtc.43.1586033716509; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 13:55:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4c8a:: with SMTP id m10mr11706409otf.114.1586033716317; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 13:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:55:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:c7d:897d:6600:3dde:82e7:e225:4ba0; posting-account=YRfoYAoAAADhSEO2nLYx10QUUvp8akYl NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:897d:6600:3dde:82e7:e225:4ba0 References: <94a54092-a56f-4a99-aaec-08dd611c8fd8@googlegroups.com> <7d0c6237-da84-4d48-8aa4-764b747975be@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <08770c5e-46d2-4f71-ac98-a9667504b83a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Proposal: Auto-allocation of Indefinite Objects From: Stephen Davies Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 20:55:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58315 Date: 2020-04-04T13:55:16-07:00 List-Id: On 2020-04-03, Stephen Davies wrote: >> >> Item : New String; [ill-thought-out proposal] On 2020-04-04, Stephen Leake wrote: > > [Ada-101 stuff ;-)] On 2020-04-04, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > This looks interesting to me. There is a huge number of cases I > am using this schema, especially when Item is initialized once. Woohoo, I'm not a complete idiot. On 2020-04-04, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > > the ARG is aware of them and has chosen to take no action. > That seems unlikely to change. Oh. :-(