From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news-out.visi.com!news-out.octanews.net!petbe.visi.com!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:19:15 -0400
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request
References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com>
 <m3isb2ey3w.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <hMnYc.1759$w%6.1486@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <m3656vfgmf.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <vpblkhspuA9F@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <e749549b.0409051449.574ec9ce@posting.google.com>
 <m3wtz7e4hd.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <413e2fbd$0$30586$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
 <e749549b.0409081708.60484f64@posting.google.com>
 <choh37$8i9$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <e749549b.0409101556.6bd1e4f6@posting.google.com> <uy8jhjfcq.fsf@obry.org>
 <2cR0d.1623$IO5.1267@trndny04> <uekl87y4p.fsf@obry.org>
 <T261d.6061$sX2.3581@trndny09> <uk6uy6s1l.fsf@act-europe.fr>
In-Reply-To: <uk6uy6s1l.fsf@act-europe.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1095110355.758187@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1095110355  3470 204.253.250.10
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3697
Date: 2004-09-13T17:19:15-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> Certainly not but if you feel like having the final word !

Oops, you're right, I apologize. The context was about
arrays in Ada vs. C. It's still meaningful though, that
you're code did translate so directly to C++. And Ada
users always have trouble with ragged arrays of strings,
precisely because of the way arrays work in Ada.