From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6511c3dc6e1155c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Ketcham Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GWindows and David Botton Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 02:36:49 -0000 Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie Message-ID: <1097894208.513443@yasure> References: <2004100312401227544%david@bottoncom> <87zn31njc6.fsf@insalien.org> <10m5opffddc6e4d@news.supernews.com> <87r7odnhv0.fsf@insalien.org> <87wty2mkhq.fsf@insalien.org> User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-29.8.progeny.8 (i686)) Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@cascadia.drizzle.com X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5302 Date: 2004-10-16T02:36:49+00:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Stephen Leake writes: >> If Meta-CVS is a purely client tool, then each developer can use it >> or not; it doesn't have to be a project-wide choice. > > Yes, it has to be project-wide. The way Meta-CVS works is this: Oh goody, more layers. Shouldn't it really be called "Meta-Meta-RCS"? > - every file in your source tree gets a unique ID > > - every file is stored in the root directory of the module in the CVS > server under that ID > > - a separate text file establishes the mapping between the unique IDs > and the path name of each file [...] Seems eerily reminiscent of Win32 "long filenames".... Don't get me wrong, I think CVS is a half-baked hack with some amazing oversights and omissions. (And is the documentation situation still as frustrating?) Still, it's the de facto standard half-baked hack, and by now all the build-managers have written their own personal versions of the scripts necessary to automate the common operations that CVS overlooks or makes needlessly tedious/counterintuitive. This "Meta-CVS" would seem much more appealing if it *were* purely client-side; has anyone attempted CVS improvements that way (I mean more than just GUI front ends)? --Benjamin