From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0833bbed8752e1f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:07:28 -0400
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: variable lenght strings
References: <ba2f9c57.0410210952.438515d@posting.google.com>
 <1861614.TWv5A9FgVL@linux1.krischik.com>
 <4178e979_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net>
 <1195374.UMjBCk7lO1@linux1.krischik.com>
 <UDSed.6962$d5.59024@newsb.telia.net>
 <1154613.ipZcUgduzp@linux1.krischik.com>
 <PaSdnX0j54BWCeDcRVn-jA@megapath.net> <ln2llc.e3u.ln@skymaster>
 <1174011.lJ1dcgRM3Q@linux1.krischik.com> <uwtxd9y9j.fsf@obry.org>
In-Reply-To: <uwtxd9y9j.fsf@obry.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1098814048.280053@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1098814048  956 204.253.250.10
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5731
Date: 2004-10-26T14:07:28-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> This kind of recursivity is very dangerous and could cause a stack
> overflow.

Why is it dangerous? Won't Ada just raise a memory exception?