From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8b8a54001adc4d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: danmcleran@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Possible Ada deficiency?
Date: 31 Dec 2004 18:02:43 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1104544963.930877.75170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1104516913.718856.94090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <iwhBd.13518$RH4.6189@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.167.82.162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1104544969 20030 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2005 02:02:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <iwhBd.13518$RH4.6189@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=172.167.82.162;
   posting-account=LSix6gsAAACmBFWMCbh6syCaua0lawvj
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7364
Date: 2004-12-31T18:02:43-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I understand your point about packages vs. tagged types. I still
believe that it would be a good thing to have a mechanism to hide
impelmentation detail from child packages. Otherwise, anyone could
write a package as a child of another and expose a public interface to
the outside world that could change the private area of its parent
package.