From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8b8a54001adc4d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: danmcleran@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Possible Ada deficiency? Date: 1 Jan 2005 07:57:53 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1104595073.731663.180100@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> References: <1104516913.718856.94090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1104544963.930877.75170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.171.120.225 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1104595077 30759 127.0.0.1 (1 Jan 2005 15:57:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:57:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=172.171.120.225; posting-account=LSix6gsAAACmBFWMCbh6syCaua0lawvj Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7376 Date: 2005-01-01T07:57:53-08:00 List-Id: Yes, but it seems like such an obvious place where bad things could happen. It seems like only goodness can be bought by having the ability to hide a type's impelmentation from child packages. I don't see any downside to providing this ability. That way, one could force a child package to use the interface provided by the public area of its parent and prevent the child from manipulating the internal representation of a type.