From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8b8a54001adc4d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: danmcleran@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Possible Ada deficiency?
Date: 1 Jan 2005 19:38:26 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1104637106.373997.67980@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
References: <1104544963.930877.75170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <HJqdnY9sK69mrkrcRVn-rg@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.167.230.238
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1104637110 32168 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2005 03:38:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <HJqdnY9sK69mrkrcRVn-rg@comcast.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=172.167.230.238;
   posting-account=LSix6gsAAACmBFWMCbh6syCaua0lawvj
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7385
Date: 2005-01-01T19:38:26-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Then why not have a construct in the language to enforce this desired
behavior? It's all well and good to say, "Don't do that!". But, the
whole idea here is to have this enforceable by the compiler, much as
other good programming practice is enforce by and Ada compiler already.