From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,721e4267bb06aac1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Pete E." <pete.eberlein@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Debugging Apex Ada 4.2.0c on Windows XP Pro
Date: 25 Jan 2005 10:58:19 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1106679499.794418.259690@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1106669148.375476.308650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.110.142
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1106679525 8522 127.0.0.1 (25 Jan 2005 18:58:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1106669148.375476.308650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.97.110.142;
   posting-account=n0J8Sw0AAAC_UEBgDdK9bo9hxrJx47Jj
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7979
Date: 2005-01-25T10:58:19-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dan T. wrote:
> Is anyone else building Ada applications using Apex Ada 4.2.0c on
> Windows XP Pro (SP2)?  I'm running into problems where the debugger
> fails, probably during program elaboration.  The same executables, on
a
> Windows 2000 Pro workstation, work fine under the debugger.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan

Hi Dan,

What kind of problems are you running into?  You might consider
contacting IBM Rational Technical Support:

Electronic Service Request (ESR):
https://www-111.ibm.com/software/support/ecare/support_login.jsp
Phone: 1.800.IBM.SERV
E-mail: sw_support@us.ibm.com
Web: http://www.ibm.com/software/rational/support
Regards,
Pete Eberlein