From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!news.zanker.org!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:01:38 +0200
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <12197617.je8LmidrTj@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <Vx33d.3580$d5.27722@newsb.telia.net>
 <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> <x7visaa4i2b.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <2617548.neE1jZqPik@linux1.krischik.com>
 <S8B3d.3680$d5.28757@newsb.telia.net>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1095696349 02 9341 1BahX3T6WCCyi+t 040920 16:05:49
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: GlqCMqZ1oeMwNv1xpeby8chIu8D8mogIdc2J4J5iPfROs0wLAzPu6+
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3868
Date: 2004-09-20T18:01:38+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bj�rn Persson wrote:

> Martin Krischik wrote:
> 
>> Simon Wright wrote:
>> 
>>>Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>"Legal" questions should be send to ada-comment@ada-auth.org. They
>>>>are the guys who can not only "advice" but also "decide" on such
>>>>issues.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure this is good advice, isn't that list for discussion of
>>>proposals for changes to the standard?
>> 
>> Currently it is mostly a "Ada.Containers" discussion list. But is is a
>> list for both changes and clarifications.
> 
> I thought Ada-comment would be appropriate if I could point to a
> paragraph in the reference manual that needed clarification. That's not
> the case. Anyway, if ObjectAda and Gnat 3.15p accept the code, I suppose
> it's legal.

Normal people don't have to point a paragraph to ask the language lawyers.
Usually it is the other way round. You asked a question and language
lawyers point out the paragraph and clarify it.

Nobody has been called names there.

With Regards

Martin

-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com