Re: Will the World ever see something beyond GNAT 3.15p?

[Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com>]

Keith Thompson wrote:

> Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com> writes:
>> Jeff C wrote:
>>
>>  
>>>  for(;P("\n"),R-;P("|"))for(e=C;e-;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> Of corse it will only link when there is a function P() somewhere. P()
>> does not nessesarly need take a char* as parameter or have any return
>> value at all - but it must exist somewhere.
> 
> It won't compile at all; it has two syntax errors.  "R-" should be
> "R--", and "e-" should be "e--".
> 
> It still won't compile without appropriate declarations for R, e, C,
> and U -- and in C99 it's illegal without a function declarations for P.

If only there was any C99 compiler. We have 2005 - name me one fully
compliant C99 compiler!

Actualy: Name me one company which is *truely* (no vaporware) commited to
provide a C99 compiler!

AFAIK only the Free Software Fondation is  *truely* commited to provide a
C99 compiler - but they are no where close.

With Regards

Martin

PS: Maybe I should cross post to comp.lang.c - not for a flame war - but
because I would be actualy interested to know if where a C99 compiler
somewhere out there.
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com