From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.152.87.226 with SMTP id bb2mr3054735lab.5.1404752918902; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Path: border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w7no8816472lbi.1!news-out.google.com!v4ni30979lbb.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Position of "use" Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:08:37 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <1404752917.2300.1.camel@pascal.home.net> References: Reply-To: pascal@obry.net NNTP-Posting-Host: pcN5MEwsnGMdMznaVbEmyw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.2-1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187430 Date: 2014-07-07T19:08:37+02:00 List-Id: Le lundi 07 juillet 2014 =C3=A0 09:45 -0700, Adam Beneschan a =C3=A9crit : > The visibility rules for context clauses are separate from visibility > rules in other cases. At the moment, I am not sure there is any > difference at all between Victor's two examples; I'll have to study > the rules carefully to make sure. It's possible that there is a > difference if there is a child package (package X.Child is ...), or if > there is a pragma in the context clause. I'll try to look at it later. I suppose it is different if there is multiple units in a single file? --=20 Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B