From: Kevin Chadwick <kevc3no4@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Empty String confusion; Positive and Natural
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:12:29 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14ff2180-6e3b-40a0-bdab-1d812826f091n@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <so56to$1t8$1@dont-email.me>
> Since String is indexed by Positive (not Natural), the lower bound
> cannot be 0. OTOH, there is no check for bounds of empty arrays,
> therefore the following would work:
> type RunOutput(LogLen, OutputLen : Natural) is record
> LogStr : String(1..LogLen);
> Output : String(1..OutputLen);
>
> and you can have empty strings if Loglen or Outputlen is 0, without
> Constraint_Error. (It's precisely for that reason that there is no check
> of bounds of empty arrays).
I See,
Thanks everyone
I apologise for posting the original thread whilst leaving the office and
posting without the code upfront.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 17:34 Empty String confusion; Positive and Natural Kevin Chadwick
2021-11-29 18:05 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2021-11-29 19:19 ` Niklas Holsti
2021-11-29 22:50 ` Kevin Chadwick
2021-11-30 8:29 ` Simon Wright
2021-11-30 8:34 ` Niklas Holsti
2021-11-30 10:00 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2021-11-30 12:17 ` Kevin Chadwick
2021-11-30 12:54 ` J-P. Rosen
2021-11-30 13:12 ` Kevin Chadwick [this message]
2021-11-30 7:40 ` ldries46
2021-11-30 8:21 ` Simon Wright
2021-11-30 12:39 ` ldries46
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox