From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:149:: with SMTP id
 x9mr6778298qvs.53.1588753993392;
        Wed, 06 May 2020 01:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7d91:: with SMTP id j17mr5512481otn.342.1588753993064;
 Wed, 06 May 2020 01:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!82.197.223.106.MISMATCH!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 01:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lywo5pa2qi.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.34.132.200;
 posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.34.132.200
References: <hhcvilFe4qrU1@mid.individual.net> <r8s1n9$ur$1@dont-email.me>
 <hhdldkFin5dU1@mid.individual.net>
 <728c5319-5f4f-4f21-9d71-cc9c12ed6016@googlegroups.com>
 <lywo5pa2qi.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <161663b3-5526-4040-b502-e5dbf074644b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How can one record component be local and another not?
From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 08:33:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58609
Date: 2020-05-06T01:33:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 10:26:14 AM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
> Mark Lorenzen writes:
> 
> > As explained by Jeffrey R. Carter above, Convention => C guarantees
> > that in/out-mode and out-mode parameters are passed by value.
> 
> By address, surely?

Bummer! Yes - by address!

Regards,
Mark L