From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,776a7f0c329d226e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!gatel-ffm!gatel-ffm!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Isnt Gnat irrelevant ? ( was Re: Will
 the	World	ever	seesomethingbeyond GNAT 3.15p?)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:37:28 +0100
Organization: None
Message-ID: <1701017.6YehVHxOrZ@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <mailman.44.1105496732.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<87wtuhi6qk.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <x7vllaxj8xp.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>	<cs74f7$an5$1@titan.btinternet.com>
	<mailman.50.1105703340.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<87u0pjq4cm.fsf@insalien.org>
	<mailman.53.1105730735.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<87mzvbpr56.fsf@insalien.org>
	<mailman.56.1105744000.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<pan.2005.01.15.00.22.12.789794@hotmail.com>
	<mailman.59.1105785061.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <csavtg$k34$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <mailman.60.1105791045.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Reply-To: martin@krischik.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1105792885 03 8487 PQ4Xrt563tDmmO3 050115 12:41:25
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: G5fVDTZDYeHOzj-rCZVwzH6l3qI7JMzT-7j1k9-+mqZQe-HdDU5G62
User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7809
Date: 2005-01-15T13:37:28+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marius Amado Alves wrote:

> Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>> Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
>> : Nobody knows.
>> (= 1)
>> 
>> : This is a legal conundrum
>> (= 2)
>> 
>> :... IANAL
>> (= 3)
>> 
>> : My additional point was that all open
>> : source is in similar chaos.
>> 
>> I read this statement in the light of the difficulties of drawing a
>> consistent conclusion from 1, 2, and 3.
> 
> Oh, please...
> 
>> What you say is in insane chaos seems to work pretty well for companies
>> with big legal departments like IBM. But maybe IBM is in chaos?
> 
> Maybe...
> 
>> Compensation, if applicable, has not not been defined here, but
>> discussed. Has anyone seen a GAP contract?
> 
> I have signed one. The gist of it is as I said: academic use only. (I'm
> not sure I can divulge the entire contract. I'll check eventually.)

More important is:

1) are stutends allowed to take copy home?
2) are you allowed to put a copy on the public ftp server for studend to
download?
3) would I be allowed to download from there for extra curriculum studies?

Martin
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com