From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,243dc2fb696a49cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:00:21 +0200
Message-ID: <18rq3ldjfiis.15dump44uot7j$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <e749549b.0409211621.6f3d3723@posting.google.com>
 <g563l0llm9trvjcn9n9ao4vit704b43kqm@4ax.com>
 <e749549b.0409230100.6a488b25@posting.google.com> <wvbrd60dusx0.fsf@sun.com>
 <e749549b.0409231111.7d98264d@posting.google.com>
 <cj0qlt$qkh$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <uy8izu0h8.fsf@earthlink.net>
 <13bv1aau5q9ht.1fr6ixcdql72.dlg@40tude.net>
 <e749549b.0409252317.67053352@posting.google.com>
 <115g0yola9l0t$.11f8io4hm9mma$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <cj932f$gmo$4@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 9U1d30sgVtZFASzO2UifjQo56OhHVcjul5jBBlfMZegrdNAag=
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.12.1
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4266
Date: 2004-09-27T16:00:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> 
>: I wished Ada had abstract record types.
> 
> Perhaps you could use a word like meta-types or type classes,
> or type types.

Maybe

> Ada does have abstract record types in any Ada sense, I'm sure
> you know this well.

Yes, you mean an abstract type which is occasionally a record type. What I
meant was records as abstract interfaces.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de