From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:df82:0:b0:474:97e5:4951 with SMTP id w2-20020a0cdf82000000b0047497e54951mr2439039qvl.96.1659121503159;
        Fri, 29 Jul 2022 12:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:f8e:0:b0:31f:4226:eb58 with SMTP id
 136-20020a810f8e000000b0031f4226eb58mr4194657ywp.19.1659121502938; Fri, 29
 Jul 2022 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tc0eq8$3fqab$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:1210:282b:1d00:497a:30a8:60c2:ac9b;
 posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:1210:282b:1d00:497a:30a8:60c2:ac9b
References: <f91d8f78-d92f-4200-a1bd-dce840bf0400n@googlegroups.com>
 <tbj438$1eab$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f88660da-350c-40df-ac70-a644e6f30661n@googlegroups.com>
 <tbqs0t$104n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tbrsd7$2iq3d$1@dont-email.me>
 <tbs5l5$1vki$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tbv792$un8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tc0eq8$3fqab$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <19e1d6b3-7bf6-4411-b9d4-10415d297aa1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Carbon
From: Gautier write-only address <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:05:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64163
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le vendredi 29 juillet 2022 =C3=A0 13:03:39 UTC+2, John McCabe a =C3=A9crit=
=C2=A0:

> The alternative would be to go and join a team that's already=20
> using Ada, but every Ada job I've seen come up locally is to support code=
=20
> that was written in Ada 95; I'd rather be looking at Ada 2005 -> if I was=
=20
> to make that jump.

It should not be a problem, since each version of Ada is compatible with th=
e previous one.
You can bring in whatever new feature is supported, especially in new packa=
ges or projects.
It's only a problem if your boss requires to stick with Ada 95.