From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8bd2:: with SMTP id n201-v6mr7913475iod.138.1534150670266; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 01:57:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:de07:: with SMTP id v7-v6mr428843oig.5.1534150670160; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 01:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g24-v6no3003108iti.0!news-out.google.com!g5-v6ni3799iti.0!nntp.google.com!w19-v6no1072374itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 01:57:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83d5:cfeb:3499:ff27:f656:4bc0; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83d5:cfeb:3499:ff27:f656:4bc0 References: <9381f30a-a957-4477-b037-b2d60041e83e@googlegroups.com> <76f6ae6a-96a7-448c-902c-978988f7aad7@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1b1ed1a0-24c0-4802-a001-5f8ab4ca10af@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: SI Units Checked and Unchecked From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:57:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54157 Date: 2018-08-13T01:57:49-07:00 List-Id: Am Freitag, 10. August 2018 22:20:12 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey R. Carter: > I was able to look at it today. Other than the checks being done by the= =20 > predicates rather than manually, and the string parsing, it doesn't seem = too=20 > different from the discriminant version I used over 20 yrs ago in Ada 83. That's correct. I like the GNAT method principally how it works with units.= What I absolutely dislike is that (since Ada is case insensitive) they inv= ent new unit and prefix symbols. Their dimensioned text output (they call i= t IO, which is a lie) is catastrophic. see http://www.christ-usch-grein.homepage.t-online.de/Ada/Dimension/Physical_un= its_with_GNAT_GPL_2013-AUJ35.1.pdf All this is corrected in my design. If these ideas could influence the GNAT= method, this would be ideal. But there does not seem to be much interest i= n the method by their clients since nothing has changed since 2013.