From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:98eb:: with SMTP id
 c40-v6mr1783440jak.32.1532125381180;
        Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4787:: with SMTP id u129-v6mr44736oia.4.1532125381069;
 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!d7-v6no2137994itj.0!news-out.google.com!l67-v6ni3441itl.0!nntp.google.com!g2-v6no2097540itf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c74ed72d-bd55-4864-b569-ed4eae88941c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=71.171.111.51;
 posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.171.111.51
References: <40d568da-4715-42de-8e28-98da39a5c974@googlegroups.com>
 <34f499f7-020f-4dcc-adad-0ab1113386d1@googlegroups.com>
 <b1e463c1-b715-49d4-8649-506b1a2bc265@googlegroups.com>
 <dbc745d2-ec83-457b-b6d9-4bbc7d824126@googlegroups.com>
 <9d69e7b5-6b2d-4607-9f7b-affa78c41620@googlegroups.com>
 <41c711cb-0300-4a41-93d3-e69297ae1945@googlegroups.com>
 <42de4aa3-9e7c-44b8-aa84-712cc7ce03c6@googlegroups.com>
 <9b6b6f10-5956-4a19-83f5-c1c015c62602@googlegroups.com>
 <c74ed72d-bd55-4864-b569-ed4eae88941c@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1c2ccf88-588a-4a03-b0c7-5d7d5a5f4edb@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Visibility of Indexing aspects
From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:23:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3115
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2174141068
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53924
Date: 2018-07-20T15:23:00-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 12:11:13 PM UTC-4, AdaMagica wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 14:08:11 UTC+2 schrieb Jere:
> > I was under the impression that scope and visibility were two different
> > things.  If I understand you correctly, it sounds like you are saying
> > that
> > 
> > package Things is
> >    --One scope
> > private
> >    --another scope
> > end Things;
> > 
> > I was under the impression that it was more like:
> > 
> > package Things is
> >    --One scope
> > private
> >    --same scope but different visibility
> > end Things;
> 
> The scope of every declaration start with the place of the declaration, so in a package or any declarative region, there are many scopes, some of which are visible, others not.
> 

Side note (not directed as a response.. just needed a reply spot):

I will say the RM would benefit with some visual examples for some 
topics (Scoping, Visibility, Accessibility).  Something like code
snippets with comments showing the various ins/outs of the
particular section above it.  It might even go a long way in 
clarifying some points of the "Heart of Darkness".  I know it
isn't necessarily an easy task and if I was able to discern it all
better, I might take a stab at it (so maybe one day in the future).

Being able to visualize where accessibility levels change 
in some of the more complex examples wold be nice for
example.