From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:07:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1egqhfcm5lik3$.iobdo22sc03i.dlg@40tude.net> References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> <1w3sfkwcp4q0e.1u4xeln7msgi5$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de d7+xdWHS07Jv9eNixILc1gPYzPtpiOxKuX46Nbk855WSFtjFs= User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.12.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2953 Date: 2004-08-24T09:07:08+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:59:36 +0000 (UTC), Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >: 1 ["="] should >: be no different from 2 [":="] or any other *operation*. > > (just not predefined?) What should be the rule for extensions, then? No different in the sense that ":=" should be treated as a primitive operation rather than a hard-wired something. I do not propose ":=" to have a result, like in C++. But clearly, it should be [multiple] dispatching. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de