From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8b8a54001adc4d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Possible Ada deficiency? Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 15:11:18 +0100 Organization: None Message-ID: <2028056.4mBM3atrO1@linux1.krischik.com> References: <1104516913.718856.94090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1104544963.930877.75170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: martin@krischik.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1104592588 02 14763 z1Hbrha1z7jAvLl 050101 15:16:28 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: XLF97UZa8eys-Mk9kA1jumyBxrBvu2RuuIiJvWUrqj2YS7db01J24r User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7371 Date: 2005-01-01T15:11:18+01:00 List-Id: danmcleran@hotmail.com wrote: > I understand your point about packages vs. tagged types. I still > believe that it would be a good thing to have a mechanism to hide > impelmentation detail from child packages. Otherwise, anyone could > write a package as a child of another and expose a public interface to > the outside world that could change the private area of its parent > package. just as anybody can type #define private public in C++. With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com