comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pipex!sunic!news.lth.se!dag@uunet.uu.net  (Dag Bruck)
Subject: Underscore ("_") in numeric literals
Date: 22 Jul 93 11:24:51 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22lte3$nqm@nic.lth.se> (raw)

I would like to know to what extent people use undescore ("_")
characters in numeric literals, e.g., "100_000".  Please send me your
opinions, etc.

I would be particularly grateful if people could point me to Ada
source archives so I can make some simple statistical analysis of real
code, or if you would like to "grep" your own code and let me know
what you got.

The reason is that the C++ standardization committees have received a
proposal to allow "_" in numeric literals.  We are interested in some
sort of indication if people find this feature useful, and if it is
commonly used in languages that have it.  If nobody uses "_" there is
no reason to add it to C++, and if it provides a significant
improvement in readability, C++ could use all the help it can get :-)


			Thanks for your help,

			Dag Bruck

             reply	other threads:[~1993-07-22 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1993-07-22 11:24 Dag Bruck [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-07-23 18:32 Underscore ("_") in numeric literals Mikey
1993-07-27 15:33 Charles H. Sampson
1993-07-27 20:17 Robert Dewar
1993-07-28  5:41 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!libra
1993-07-28  5:43 Dag Bruck
1993-07-28 14:22 Mike Berman
1993-08-04 14:43 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen
1993-08-04 16:04 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.ed
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox