From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fa84:: with SMTP id o4mr4998692qvn.163.1596462432940; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a37:4811:: with SMTP id v17mr16739054qka.166.1596462432396; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.5.2.231; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.5.2.231 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <283e0473-163b-425d-ae8b-5cff2b15b3ado@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Polyorb abd the DSA Annex From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:47:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:59638 List-Id: On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 5:42:02 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote: > On 03/08/2020 12:04, tonyg wrote: > > I just tried to build the git cloned copy of polyorb (failed on the con= figure!) with the 2020 community version of GNAT. It said I had no gnat ada= compiler. It was on the path and it pointed to the gcc compiler on the pat= h. Are they compatible? Is there still a polyorb "enthusiast" list ? > >=20 >=20 > Distributed annex is being removed from gnat due to "lack of customer int= erest." This is pretty sad, and IMO, stupid; the ability to [relatively] easily mak= e distributed applications via DSA is a killer feature and, in conjunction = with Ada2020 'parallel' blocks/loops would make for a very attractive syste= m. IOW, the "lack of customer interest" is an excuse to shoot themselves in th= e foot.