From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:50c7:: with SMTP id e7mr14855262qvq.58.1615080409728;
        Sat, 06 Mar 2021 17:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b906:: with SMTP id x6mr23398043ybj.504.1615080409556;
 Sat, 06 Mar 2021 17:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 17:26:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <s20oa3$s4r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2804:14c:4c1:b99c:427a:3cbe:16b:4fda;
 posting-account=wgmHdgoAAAA-F7JItPEZjeXqFc0KdzEQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2804:14c:4c1:b99c:427a:3cbe:16b:4fda
References: <53c7e210-03cd-46b2-8cc7-ac963292dd1dn@googlegroups.com> <s20oa3$s4r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2e10ee22-3327-4c31-9527-fdf115e4efdan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Pool and SubPools can be used for remote access ?
From: Daniel Norte Moraes <danielcheagle@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 01:26:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61495
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Em s=C3=A1bado, 6 de mar=C3=A7o de 2021 =C3=A0s 17:22:34 UTC-3, Dmitry A. K=
azakov escreveu:
> On 2021-03-06 20:48, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:=20
>=20
> > I'm learning mpi and openMP and take this insite:=20
> > ? Is possible to use remote data ( e.g. shared memory , variables etc [=
=20
> > via network and other protocols]) by implementing=20
> > an custom storage_pool's ? the array in storage pool need be continuous=
 or=20
> > an 'fake-length' array is ok ? someone already tried it yet ?
> Storage pool can be backed by whatever mechanism. The layout of objects=
=20
> allocated in the pool depends on the object. The strategy could be=20
> mirroring remote objects or using proxy object instead.=20
>=20
> As for implementations there exist distributed annex implementations=20
> which must support remote objects.=20

 Beyond polyorb, there other implentations ? can you cite some ?

>=20
> There exist persistent storage implementations. Persistent objects=20
> resemble remote objects in many aspects.=20
>=20

can cite some?

> There exist interprocess shared storage pools implementation.=20
>=20
can cite some ?

> If remote objects should be implemented as stored in a pool is quite=20
> questionable. Pool is too low level mechanism. Having an object in a=20
> pool would preclude a lot of functionality, safety and reliability.=20
>=20
> --=20
> Regards,=20
> Dmitry A. Kazakov=20
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Thanks !