From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8a6e6d9458ae6ddc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Nick Roberts <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:52:51 +0100
Message-ID: <2rg6a1F1arg02U1@uni-berlin.de>
References: <5ad0dd8a.0409221652.6a69b336@posting.google.com>
 <5ad0dd8a.0409230035.337f9305@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de giOMaGNO6v35shbW3twBUQSkdFmsbL3jlCj9VzP3DgNPaT01g=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <5ad0dd8a.0409230035.337f9305@posting.google.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4020
Date: 2004-09-23T15:52:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Wojtek Narczynski wrote:

> Okay, I wasn't thinking. It obviously isn't a compiler bug.

To clarify (hopefully), there is a line which changes the value of 
Current_Hook:

    Current_Hook := Current_Hook.all.Down'Unchecked_Access;

The value of Current would not have been changed by this statement, so it 
would presumably have been left referring to the wrong thing. The code 
shown is quite complex, and Wojtek can be forgiven for initially missing 
this (in my humble opinion).

-- 
Nick Roberts