From: "Theodore E. Dennison" <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Cc: dewar@gnat.com
Subject: Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!?
Date: 1996/04/22
Date: 1996-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <317BEC5C.237C228A@escmail.orl.mmc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.830136560@schonberg
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> Here is one respect in which Ada 95 is clearly superior to Fortran
> for numerical applications. In Ada 95, there are accuracy requirements
> for the trig functions, there are no such requirements in Ada 95.
This should read more like,
"In Ada 95, there are accuracy requirements for the trig functions,
there are no such requirements in Fortran".
Robert asked me to post this correction for him, as he is temporarily
away from an internet terminal. Apparently he has trouble bringing
himself to type "the F word". :-)
--
T.E.D.
| Work - mailto:dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com |
| Home - mailto:dennison@iag.net |
| URL - http://www.iag.net/~dennison |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-20 0:00 Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!? Kenneth Mays
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Linh C. Nguyen
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1996-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison [this message]
1996-04-22 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-04-21 0:00 ` busigin
1996-04-22 0:00 `
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-23 0:00 ` Jim Carr
1996-04-23 0:00 ` David Kristola
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Thomas Koenig
1996-04-29 0:00 ` marukka
1996-04-26 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-04-29 0:00 ` AdaWorks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox