From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ffce418d7a49585f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-16 10:55:54 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!psinntp!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Vendor bashing? Sort of. Date: 15 Sep 1994 09:30:46 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <359ia6$lkj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <354j4k$2fe@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <35517g$8um@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu> <355o58$isa@felix.seas.gwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-09-15T09:30:46-04:00 List-Id: Mike Ryer points out that the Ada mandate perhaps encouraged too many basic technologies to be developed, and guesses that with no mandate, there might have been a smaller more reasonable number. I am afraid that number might well have been zero (consider as an example Algol-68 or many other languages designed since then).