From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,622044e7c0c2df07 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-16 10:55:54 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!psinntp!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT 1.8? for OS/2 (was Re: GNAT 1.82 for Linux) Date: 15 Sep 1994 09:44:13 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <359j3d$lva@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <351ifb$ml8@babyblue.cs.yale.edu> <351mo1$s1j@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Keywords: GNAT OS/2 Date: 1994-09-15T09:44:13-04:00 List-Id: The delay in 1.82 OS/2 version is a hopefully one time glitch related to the new version of GCC. At this stage we will go straight to a 1.83 release, and hope to have them all out. P.S. As usual, I remind that questions like this should ALSO be directed to gnat-report!