From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791ecb084fdaba75 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-03 03:01:51 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Types with physical dimension Date: 3 Oct 1994 00:40:40 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <36o208$r57@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <36deok$dce@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-03T00:40:40-04:00 List-Id: Tuck takes me to task for not including the "given infinite resources :-) from his original message. But of course the point is that infinite resources for implementation are totally besides the point, I have no concern for implementors in this discussion, only for readers, and unless infinite resources also gives readers infinite brain power, it won't help :-)