From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a8985ede8fe3d111 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-05 18:06:22 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Ada the future? [was: Is C++ the future?] Date: 5 Oct 1994 09:15:14 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <36u8t2$1n6@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <1994Oct03.092205.14115@sydney.DIALix.oz.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-05T09:15:14-04:00 List-Id: OK, so Denver was C++, but let's avoid the mistake of assuming that the problems were due to the language, until we know more.