From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18069d15345a10c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-13 09:46:56 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Modulus and Remainder operations (Was Re: Help with a bit of C
 code)
Date: 13 Oct 1994 08:30:32 -0400
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <37j998$p5e@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <hbakerCxFK2p.4wp@netcom.com> <1994Oct11.161048.1058@nosc.mil>
 <37er8t$oh0@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <hbakerCxL95y.8L3@netcom.com>
 <1994Oct13.092135@di.epfl.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-10-13T08:30:32-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I might add to Magus' comment about the limited type issue being solved in
Ada 9X is that this is not some accident, but rather an important consequence
of a quite deliberate review of the status of limited objects in Ada, no
doubt informed by useful contributions from Henry and others :-)