From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f805ceba146bd74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-15 19:38:27 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994 Date: 13 Oct 1994 15:55:37 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <37k3bp$2sf@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu> <37haa0$baf@scoop.eco.twg.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-13T15:55:37-04:00 List-Id: I also vote in favor of retaining 9X! By the way, how many people know that Ada 83 should really be called Ada 87 (I guess there is some country out there in the New World that thinks the standardization happened in 1993, but I see no reason for the world community to pay any attention to local affairs of that kind).