From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18069d15345a10c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-17 03:31:05 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Modulus and Remainder operations (Was Re: Help with a bit of C code) Date: 14 Oct 1994 18:11:59 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <37mvnf$sr@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <37er8t$oh0@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <1994Oct13.092135@di.epfl.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-14T18:11:59-04:00 List-Id: Well Henry, of course anyone can play the part of "completely bamboozled by yet another incomprehensible Ada rule from those language lawyers", but *really* the rule on limited types is quite easy to understand, and the design and motivation behind the rule seems quite clear.