From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5015e00941d1492 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-19 19:23:03 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Magnavox consultant trashes Ada tools in IEEE Computer Date: 19 Oct 1994 09:31:33 -0400 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <38373l$fq8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <1994Oct17.164852.1@delphi.dasd.honeywell.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-10-19T09:31:33-04:00 List-Id: a WEEK of compile time on the 486!!! Gads, on my thinkpad, which is not such a fast 486 since it lacks an L2 cache, I figure I could compile 15 million lines of Ada using GNAT in a week, and that's using the crippled version of GNAT with all the debugging checks (the only version we distribute right now!) Just how big is this system anyway?