From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-23 10:31:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.213.69.151!news.algonet.se!algonet!pepsi.tninet.se!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Skoglund <stetson@ebox.tninet.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of   
 service attack.
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:17:02 +0200
Organization: Telenordia
Message-ID: <3B853A8E.DDE8316F@ebox.tninet.se>
References: <bebbba07.0107292308.d1192fc@posting.google.com>
   <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl> <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu>
 <made-on-a-macintosh-969204-20460@usenet.l1t.lt>
 <9kbvsr$a02@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3B69DB35.4412459E@home.com>
 <q22nk9.r1p.ln@10.0.0.2> <JzUb7.1653$NJ6.5860@www.newsranger.com>
 <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <apesk9.env.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <sYwc7.3920$NJ6.15560@www.newsranger.com>
 <1exve0j.1lboe8gneysd0N%clarkcox3@yahoo.com>
 <wdzc7.4066$NJ6.17172@www.newsranger.com> <rvnuk9.2ua.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <3B784DCB.A3BF419D@ebox.tninet.se> <9lr3tt$4gr$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: du25-153.ppp.algonet.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: cubacola.tninet.se 998587617 14187 195.100.153.25 (23 Aug 2001
 17:26:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@algo.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Aug 2001 17:26:57 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: sv,en,en-US
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12349
Date: 2001-08-23T17:26:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marin David Condic wrote:
> business...) It would be nice to know what designers are using these days
> instead of the 1750 for deep space and to have a look at the architecture to
> see what they did with cache, etc.

Someone was talking about a radhard SPARC variant.
It probably implements sparc v 7 instruction set.