comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Norte Moraes <danielcheagle@gmail.com>
Subject: Ada Pure or Preelaborate or ? in Adare_net
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 08:13:31 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b7ba153-ebf1-4b85-a1b2-3ad5aaeca11en@googlegroups.com> (raw)

Hi! 

I and a friend created an Ada network lib where,
from the begining, we tried very hard to make It a Ada Pure.

From the examples dir, the lib worked as expected (in gcc-10.2 gcc-11.2 and gcc-12).
To our surprise, what most caught the attention of the group's friends was the fact that the lib was Ada Pure and if that was correct.

For this reason, if really 'is' pure, not pure, preelaborate or what (?), pleeeeeeaaase, we ask the group's Ada Language Lawyers to help analyze and suggest modifications  if necessary. 

link: https://gitlab.com/daresoft/network/adare_net/-/tree/202x
for Ada version use 2012 and or 202x.

Best Wishes and Happy New Year,
Dani.



             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-31 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-31 16:13 Daniel Norte Moraes [this message]
2022-01-04  1:11 ` Ada Pure or Preelaborate or ? in Adare_net Simon Belmont
2022-01-05 16:11   ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2022-01-04 13:52 ` Fabien Chouteau
2022-01-05 16:33   ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2022-01-05 23:40     ` Randy Brukardt
2022-01-06 20:39       ` Daniel Norte Moraes
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox