Re: UML & Ada

["Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>]

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrn9vk9f4.3qs.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 05:32:59 GMT, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> > I'm not very fond of UML, as it seems you need a large number of
> > diagrams, each of which contributes a couple of bits to the total
> > description. I much prefer something like CAIM, in which a few diagrams
> > each contribute a great deal.
>
> I have been looking a bit on OMT as it is used in an OOP text book I
> bought. Does anybody know how good OMT is? I also found a page for
> mapping from OMT associations to Ada:
>
> http://www.clark.net/pub/dsmith/OO/overview.html

Well, Rumbaugh published his book in 1991 and has since joined up
with Rational together with Jacobson and Booch, publishing work
together in 1998/1999, so no matter how good it is, I suspect that
there will be little market left for it now...

I suspect that a lot of the OMT concepts are actually in the UML
anyway and so the mapping may be similar.