From: Olivier Henley <olivier.henley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 'Number_Of_CPUs' tasks creation, with discriminants, running simultaneously.
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:31:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c8ea85b-501b-4489-bf85-e1f5567a14d4o@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rf4l8i$o1j$1@dont-email.me>
> The order of the discriminants is arbitrary; there is no guarantee that Worker (I) will have ID of I. Elaboration is sequential, so each Worker will have a unique ID.
As long as all the tasks get a unique ID, I am fine.
Function as a discriminant at elaboration ... should have thought about it but it looks like I am missing some wisdom points.
Thank you Jeffrey.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 13:51 'Number_Of_CPUs' tasks creation, with discriminants, running simultaneously Olivier Henley
2020-07-20 13:55 ` Olivier Henley
2020-07-20 17:45 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-07-20 20:31 ` Olivier Henley [this message]
2020-07-22 19:05 ` onox
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox