From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Language Lawyers help on rep_specs
Date: 3 Jan 1995 10:06:24 -0500
Date: 1995-01-03T10:06:24-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ebp5g$j9t@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 393@hathor.CSS.GOV
You mention in your message comparing "two vendors Ada 95 compilers". Since
no vendor has an Ada 95 compiler yet, this can't be literally the case,
so we must assume you are dealing with two prereleases of partial
implementations.
The rep clause (not spec please!) is perfectly valid, and conversions are
static in Ada 95 (but not in Ada 83).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-01-03 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-01-03 12:49 Language Lawyers help on rep_specs Jeff Etrick
1995-01-03 14:50 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1995-01-03 16:30 ` Tucker Taft
1995-01-03 18:04 ` Robert Dewar
1995-01-03 18:07 ` Robert Dewar
1995-01-03 15:06 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1995-01-04 14:40 ` Norman H. Cohen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox