From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5048:: with SMTP id h8mr11491592qtm.328.1575622626971;
        Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:57:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2046:: with SMTP id
 f6mr9067057otp.206.1575622626647;
 Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!g89no10709339qtd.0!news-out.google.com!w29ni259qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g89no10709333qtd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 00:57:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f5b3464a-21de-4d75-858a-054178434d54@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=185.22.143.114;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.22.143.114
References: <qs8du6$sg4$1@dont-email.me>
 <f0d2cb32-33fd-4420-bf93-62bf0c005ba0@googlegroups.com>
 <qs8nmg$mm9$1@dont-email.me>
 <f5b3464a-21de-4d75-858a-054178434d54@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3f12f2df-cd5d-4862-9ca0-9a16d4d7cff3@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Type naming conventions: Any_Foo
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:57:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57665
Date: 2019-12-06T00:57:06-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2019 11:51:36 UTC+1 schrieb AdaMagica:
> procedure Attack (Using: Weapon);
> Attack (Using => Catapult);

As nice as this may read in user's code, within the body of Attack, the parameter name is not optimal.

Also a declaration like

  My_Weapon: Weapons.Weapon;

is akward when use-clause is banned. So a further point to consider is whether you want your package to be used with use-clause or without:

  My_Weapon: Weapons.Object;

I'm not sure I like this.