From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Gurus - which lang. for this task?
Date: 24 Jan 1995 14:15:37 -0500
Date: 1995-01-24T14:15:37-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3g3jkp$3he@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3g0rc9$o4j@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM
First of all "suffering from multi-day linking operations" is a characteristic
of an implementation not a language. Certainly it is clear that linking an
Ada program should take no more or less time thank linking an equivalent
C program, and certainly GNAT (and I would think lots of other Ada compilers)
achieve this equivalence in practice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-01-24 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1995Jan12.143131.2083@midway.uchicago.edu>
[not found] ` <3fh4l1$mpm@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
[not found] ` <3fuskb$hae@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1995-01-23 18:09 ` Gurus - which lang. for this task? Cameron Laird
1995-01-23 19:27 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-01-24 17:32 ` Anticipatory proxies for disaster (was: Gurus - which lang. for this task?) Cameron Laird
1995-01-25 2:07 ` Gurus - which lang. for this task? Robert Dewar
1995-01-24 19:15 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1995-01-25 14:45 ` Ada link times David Emery
1995-01-25 5:14 ` Gurus - which lang. for this task? Samuel Mize
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox