From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news14-e.free.fr!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:11:53 +0200
From: Lionel Draghi <Lionel.nospam.Draghi@Ada-France.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040820 Debian/1.7.2-4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, it
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request
References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com>
 <6F2Yc.848$8d1.621@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <m3isb2ey3w.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <hMnYc.1759$w%6.1486@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <m3656vfgmf.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <e749549b.0409042036.5d4822a2@posting.googlOrganization: LJK Software
 <vpblkhspuA9F@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <e749549b.0409051449.574ec9ce@posting.google.com>
 <m3wtz7e4hd.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <413e2fbd$0$30586$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
 <e749549b.0409081708.60484f64@posting.google.com>
 <opsd1ddija5afhvo@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <opsd1ddija5afhvo@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4140b906$0$29447$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Sep 2004 22:11:50 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.64.179.14
X-Trace: 1094760710 news14-e.free.fr 29447 82.64.179.14:41003
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3547
Date: 2004-09-09T22:11:50+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ed Falis wrote:
> I agree to a good extent with Kevin.  I tend to use test-first, 
> assertions  (or DbC if available) and static typing to complement each 
> other.  And  they do.

Is it really your opinion, Kevin?
If yes, I am pleased to see that we fully agree ;-)

And you Jon?

OK, I suppose it's because of my poor english that I thought you where 
underestimating type usefulness :-)

-- 
Lionel Draghi