From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news10-e.free.fr!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:55:47 +0200
From: Lionel Draghi <Lionel.nospam.Draghi@Ada-France.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040820 Debian/1.7.2-4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, it
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request
References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com>
 <hMnYc.1759$w%6.1486@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <m3656vfgmf.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <e749549b.0409042036.5d4822a2@posting.googlOrganization: LJK Software
 <vpblkhspuA9F@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <e749549b.0409051449.574ec9ce@posting.google.com>
 <m3wtz7e4hd.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
 <413e2fbd$0$30586$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
 <e749549b.0409081708.60484f64@posting.google.com>
 <4140b5cc$0$17701$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
 <e749549b.0409101535.4f6b1772@posting.google.com>
 <m3oekb8n6k.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3oekb8n6k.fsf@rigel.goldenthreadtech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4144d3ee$0$8754$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Sep 2004 00:55:42 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.64.15.8
X-Trace: 1095029742 news10-e.free.fr 8754 82.64.15.8:59882
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3638
Date: 2004-09-13T00:55:42+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

...
>>>Anyway, I enter in this thread because of the claim that typing has much 
>>>less value than test-first.
> It is _static_ typing that has much less value, not typing!

>>>I still wait for any illustration of this claim.
>>>(and I feel that I will wait for a long time)
>>
>>I don't think you will wait all that long.  Test-first development is
>>no longer a radical idea.  Increasing numbers of serious software
>>development shops, like SABRE, are getting good results from
>>test-first development.
>
> Agreed.

With what? This is not at all related to my point.
I am not waiting for whatever about XP development, not even success 
stories, because we already have this at work.
I am waiting for any point explaining how Agile methods raise static 
typing more or less obsolete.
There is no relation between those: you could have raise all your points 
before XP creation, all this thread is just a (usual) discussion about 
typing.

-- 
Lionel Draghi