From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c23311c4d57b937e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Cesar Rabak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Embedded Keynote Speaker Mentions Ada Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:56:59 -0300 Message-ID: <4150CDDB.6080206@acm.org> References: <414B6E62.9070402@acm.org> <0hL2d.762$QB1.501@trndny02> <414E2306.6030404@acm.org> <8%q3d.1820$kn2.1441@trndny07> <414EE3A0.9080106@acm.org> <97de285c.0409211234.596b663a@posting.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Axhv8oV1tdarUzNF0JqgBwrDqYQpnbfIMv1qQVCRyWmLHCIMI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: pt-br, pt Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3913 Date: 2004-09-21T21:56:59-03:00 List-Id: Tom escreveu: > Cesar Rabak wrote in message news:<414EE3A0.9080106@acm.org>... > >>stephane richard escreveu: >> > "Cesar Rabak" wrote in message >>[snipped] >> >>Second, academia (the three amigos on UML, for example) abandoned the >>use of Ada in favor of C++ bringing a perceived vision of the "way to >>go" for less technically oriented people. Now, let me ask you: if you go >>to a newstand where fine IT magazines are sold what are the odds a >>manager sees CUJ or VisualBasic or perhaps a .Net mag, and what are the >>chances Ada is ever mentioned? And to finally blow the wollf dead most >>of the 'Research' and 'Advisory' firms when mention Ada send the message >>it is a 'niche' language or an 'ageing' technology not to be considered >>for new developements. . . >> > > Where do you think that they might be getting that idea? For academia, I sincerely don't know, as the 'market forces' are somewhat different. For commercial software, I think the major players are more interested in selling their propriatary languages, C++ being IMHO an exception, perhaps to fade away with the advent of C#. > When I was > doing a quick search for information on Ada I put "Ada compilers" in > for the search term on google. I found a fair number of the most > popular web sites were not updated in the last several years. It does I've done the same research and unfortunately you are right. Also, a coleague of mine call my attention on the existance of a sort of guideline for writing open source where the language of choice is C (I'm looking for it, if I find something more exact, I post a pointer here). > not distill a lot of confidence in a computer language when the so > called enthusiasts can't even keep their web sites up to date. If > this was not bad enough one of the Windows compiler distributors did > not even mention WindowsXP. The last operating system that they say > works with their compiler is Win95. Come on, if the enthusiasts can't > stay up to date then what chance is there of convincing someone new to > Ada that it is not 'ageing' technology. I see. -- Cesar Rabak