From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4368e7c7118de06c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ICFP2004 results are in Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:16:27 +0100 Organization: BAE SYSTEMS Message-ID: <415187d0_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> References: X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de MZplBSDw57qb7O0Cqafq8gK6sKoEA1lFK5QI3d47Xj1FHsS5Zv X-Orig-Path: baen1673807.greenlnk.net!baen1673807!not-for-mail X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: baen1673807.greenlnk.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3938 Date: 2004-09-22T15:16:27+01:00 List-Id: Marius Amado Alves wrote: > The *problems* are interesting, but IMO they have nothing to do with > programming language. It is almost invariably an artificial > intelligence problem. The success depends on the artificial > intelligence method devised, not on the choice of programming > language. (For the 2004 ants problem I think I would have bet on a > genetic programming solution.) > > Unfortunately the problems are the only interesting thing in these > contests. The prize money is too low (specially after division by 5 or > 10 team members), the choice of programming language is a false target > as I said, and the winners are called bad names ("discriminating > hacker") go figure! But - there's no such thing as bad publicity...