From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8dc50f1b24590126 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: visibility of private incomplete types Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:36:25 +0100 Organization: BAE SYSTEMS Message-ID: <4181108a_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> References: <4180fb61$0$20941$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de kGpjYiPUYzO6xMQX+/KNawuKhMvqUmg1ZrJlVbPXDHyGp+QdAI X-Orig-Path: baen1673807.greenlnk.net!baen1673807!not-for-mail X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: baen1673807.greenlnk.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5799 Date: 2004-10-28T16:36:25+01:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > is GNAT correct in compiling the following program > without complaints? (There is a complaint if the > function in the body of P is uncommented.) No - according to ObjectAda v 7.2.2